« only thing that really matters is a classical sauce | Main | and even if my house falls down, i wouldn't have a clue »
Who else is gonna bring you a bottle of rain?
by anna at 07:36 PM on November 08, 2004
Yeah, but is Ghost art? Rachel Whiteread and her legion of fans sure think so. That I can agree with. I have no problem with her winning the ever controversial Turner Prize. I do take exception to Paul Richard's 15 paragraph article, waxing all rhapsodic about this damn thing. Does it really, "sympathetically acknowledge both the struggles of the common man and the high purities of abstraction?" Is it really, "British in its intimate shabbiness, its hip rejection of posh..?" Does it really evoke Bruce Nauman's A Cast of the Space Under My Chair? I'm thinking, no. Or yes.
Why no link? The only image I could find was in the Washington Post article and they have that damn registration feature. So I will describe it for you. It's a big white block of plaster that is all backwards. The fireplace bulges out towards you instead of inward. There are square lumps here and there. It is very...square. It looks like a tomb that might house a germphobe.
Whiteread's masterpiece is now on display at the National Gallery of Art. It's on loan, and it's very valuable in the parallel universe of contemporary art. We Washingtonians have billionaire art collector Mitchell Rales to thank for our viewing pleasure. Richard estimates it cost $1 million to bring it over here.
Maybe it's the low-def photo in the Post, but I can't see the soot still in the "negative fireplace." I can't discern the single door, or the "bruised windowsash" or the "pathetic gentility of the Victorian picture rail that runs around the walls." I don't understand the concept of an "anti-room" any more than I do antimatter. I do detect the snobbishness of rich snooty people looking down on us the great unwashed. Yes, that is coming through loud and clear, just as it did after the election results sunk in.
Meanwhile, over in war-ravaged Sudan, a 15 year old girl writhes in a makeshift tent as tribal elders pour water from a gourd onto her head. It's a primitive cleansing ritual. She's several months pregnant after being gang-raped by marrauding Arab madmen. Abortion isn't an option under tribal custom. It isn't likely anyone will marry her or agree to raise the biracial child as their own. It is a shameful stain not only upon her but her extended family. She'll live with that the remainder of her miserable life. She'd love to live somewhere that had those pathetic Victorian rails.
Is it just me or is something awfully amiss with both these stories appearing in the same paper on the same day? Sure, Mr. Rales could have parted with his $1 million any way he pleases. It is, after all, his money. Still, I have to think that sum would have gone a long way toward protecting the Sudanese lass from the horrors she experienced and the worst to come. I guess it's a question of your priorities. But if you ask me, these questions of basic human dignity need to be addressed before we can stand around peering at at some plaster sculpture of nothing and calling it art. And by addressing I don't mean world king Coffee Annan wringing his bony hands and lamenting this tragedy in his clipped, Eddie Murphy in Coming to America tones.
*Slumps down on soapbox and assumes the brooding position of Rodin's The Thinker* Now, that's a sculpture.
comments (9)
There are many worlds out there in this world, some polar opposites. Lockheed would put a million dollars in an annuity for himself and his companion. If I had more knowledge of the Sudanese situation, maybe I would adopt the bi-racial child and rear him to latter day greatness...but as of right now, this all seems impossible... I'm short 1 million euros, but it's a slow grind, and I might get a margin call before it goes my way... if it goes my way, I might very well adopt that poor child. If not, then I will put myself up for adoption.
by LOCKHEED at November 9, 2004 3:24 AM
I'm not really sure what you are talking about, but to help anyone else out here ar e some pictures of this Ghost you speak of.
by mg at November 9, 2004 6:54 AM
Damn MG, I tried Google image search and came up with a big fat 0. Thanks, man.
by anna at November 9, 2004 7:53 AM
I love art, but I hate when people try to force me to see what they think it means. To me, that piece of art is dead boring. The end.
by Linz at November 10, 2004 11:27 AM
Organized religion is no different Linz. I believe in God but don't need anyone to force me to believe what they think a scripture means. Art is definitely like that too. I'm not too sure of the Ghost art MG linked us to. My first reaction was "Huh?"
by Ezy at November 10, 2004 2:04 PM
Well, this Paul Richard managed to take up 25 papragraphs or so trying to tell people what the damn thing means. And it turns out that it narrowly missed getting burned up in a fire. The contemporary art world breathed a collective sigh of relief. Hey Lindsey we have something in common, a love of art.
by anna at November 10, 2004 6:12 PM
That would be Lindsay there Anna. Now, go sit in the corner until I tell you you can go outside and play with the other kids.
by Ezy at November 11, 2004 10:12 AM
No way. That doesn't look right at all.
by anna at November 11, 2004 6:50 PM
Looks can be deceiving ;-)
by Ezy at November 12, 2004 9:24 AM

